Dreadnought
Oct 2, 03:04 PM
That's strange, the console version should be a bit faster then the gui version. Especially on older/slower machines. All of the cpu power goes to crunching the WU, there isn't a bit that helps the graphics card making the picture, so the console version should be faster.
DoFoT9
Jan 14, 06:48 AM
man we are not doing good as a team. we rank number 109 in recent average credit and #127 in total credit.
we need to get busy!
bahahah trust me im busy!!!!
1. imac dv 400mhz running at 100% CPU 24/7
2. mbp cd 2.16ghz running at 40% CPU (used to be 80% but got too hot)
3. imac 2.8ghz running at 100% CPU (when dad doesnt stop it lol)
if my pc had a network card it would be doing it aswell lol
but yea, im getting ~1200 average. not too shabby i say lol
we need to get busy!
bahahah trust me im busy!!!!
1. imac dv 400mhz running at 100% CPU 24/7
2. mbp cd 2.16ghz running at 40% CPU (used to be 80% but got too hot)
3. imac 2.8ghz running at 100% CPU (when dad doesnt stop it lol)
if my pc had a network card it would be doing it aswell lol
but yea, im getting ~1200 average. not too shabby i say lol
Mike Teezie
Mar 22, 11:41 PM
True that they should have produced a sequel, but Tecmo is known for building upon already released titles (DOA2 had SEVERAL "remakes"). Hopefully if this sells well, they'll actually produce a proper sequel. I'm guessing since sales were probably okay with the Xbox version, they wanted to try the PS3 market for a change. We'll see what happens.
Such a shame really, as it was a brilliant game. NG is the only other game besides Halo I ever played on my Xbox.
Double shame I won't be able to play it on my 360 either.
Such a shame really, as it was a brilliant game. NG is the only other game besides Halo I ever played on my Xbox.
Double shame I won't be able to play it on my 360 either.
DeSnousa
May 23, 04:37 PM
Thanks this is awesome little widget. Thanks for taking time to make it. :)
redAPPLE
Oct 22, 06:56 AM
Originally posted by Spock
Hahahahahahaha RiGhT!!! and I'm Steve Job's.
hi STEVE!
i am redAPPLE :)
Hahahahahahaha RiGhT!!! and I'm Steve Job's.
hi STEVE!
i am redAPPLE :)
3777
Sep 17, 10:55 AM
Originally posted by jefhatfield
by mwsf, i predict:
tibook will go to 1 ghz, no superdrive
powermac will stay the same
ibook will go to 800 mhz high end
imac will go to 900 mhz high end
emac will to go 900 mhz high end
crt imac will be retired
ipod will go down to $249 USD
jaguar will remain and os x 10.3 will come mid 2003
and all basic level macs will have a minimum of 256 MB RAM since 128 MB RAM is too small for OS X
my 2 cents;)
but here is what i want which i don't really expect in reality:
tibook with superdrive and up to 1.25 ghz
or...dual tibook
ibook to 1 ghz
or...g4 ibook
emac and imac to 1 ghz
ipod to $199 USD
crt imac to $649 USD
:D :D :D
If these predictions are correct then Apple is finished. They need to get everything to at least 1ghz, iMac, eMac, and get g4's in their iBooks, or they are going to lose even more people.
by mwsf, i predict:
tibook will go to 1 ghz, no superdrive
powermac will stay the same
ibook will go to 800 mhz high end
imac will go to 900 mhz high end
emac will to go 900 mhz high end
crt imac will be retired
ipod will go down to $249 USD
jaguar will remain and os x 10.3 will come mid 2003
and all basic level macs will have a minimum of 256 MB RAM since 128 MB RAM is too small for OS X
my 2 cents;)
but here is what i want which i don't really expect in reality:
tibook with superdrive and up to 1.25 ghz
or...dual tibook
ibook to 1 ghz
or...g4 ibook
emac and imac to 1 ghz
ipod to $199 USD
crt imac to $649 USD
:D :D :D
If these predictions are correct then Apple is finished. They need to get everything to at least 1ghz, iMac, eMac, and get g4's in their iBooks, or they are going to lose even more people.
dmw007
Apr 11, 08:42 PM
Nice to see a news agency that is Pro Apple! :)
dongmin
Sep 15, 01:25 PM
At least AppleP58 had some details and a schematic drawing. This guy is not offering much to bite on.
Maybe the G5 is coming but it could just be a newer variant of the G4, the 7470 or 7500, with some new technolgoies like RapidI/O and/or Hypertransport. Throw in FW2 and some other new stuff, and Apple might feel justified in calling it a G5.
Maybe the G5 is coming but it could just be a newer variant of the G4, the 7470 or 7500, with some new technolgoies like RapidI/O and/or Hypertransport. Throw in FW2 and some other new stuff, and Apple might feel justified in calling it a G5.
vniow
Oct 31, 01:32 PM
I'm not sure if this has been posted before, but I just saw this (http://xlr8yourmac.com/archives/oct02/103002.html#S14660) article yesterday at XLR8yourmac.com
Info on Non-Pioneer Superdrive in recent iMac G4s (DVD-R/-RW plus DVD-RAM?) About a month or so ago I had heard that some new iMac G4s had non-Pioneer DVD-R/RW drives - a reader with one of these just sent an email with more info:
" Hey Mike ...
Just wanted to let you know that Apple has changed the SuperDrive in the latest shipping iMacs. I just bought a 17" iMac LCD straight from Apple's Developer Connection (we're Select developers at work) and I was surprised to see that Mac OS 9.2.2's Apple System Profiler identified the drive as
-------------------------------------------------------------------
DVD-R/CD-RW
Driver version: 1.4.8
Mac OS partitions: 0
Removable media: Yes
Vendor: HL-DT-ST
Revision Number: D02D
Product ID: DVD-RW GCA-4020B
Apple disc burning: Supported
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Depending on who you believe, "HL-DT-ST" is either Hitachi or GoldStar in Korea - I'm not sure which.
A few Google searches revealed that this drive does DVD-R, DVD-RW *and* DVD-RAM! And, supposedly, the CD-R burning speeds are 12x, which is apparently faster than the previous Pioneer SuperDrives. (I can't personally verify this myself, not knowing the specs of the Pioneer A03/A04)
(Pioneer DVR-104/A04 and 103/A04 have a 8x/4x max (CDR/CDRW) burn speed rating.-Mike)
The only place I could find on the Mac Web that mentioned this new development is a 5-day old article on MacWelt.DE, the German Mac site.
Regards,
- Greg E"
About a dozen readers wrote in reply to this post mentioning LG or Hitachi links, etc. - another iMac G4 owner sent info from the label on the drive:
"FYI, I'll read off the label on a superdrive taken out of 17" iMac delivered approx. 3 weeks ago (yep, I've opened the iMac to take a closer look):
H�L Data Storage
CD-RW / DVD-R/RW DRIVE
MODEL No. GCA-4020B
DRIVE REV. A1
manufactured SEPTEMBER 2002
Hitachi-LG Data Storage, Inc.
(...), Tokyo, Japan
MADE IN JAPAN
I tried to look up tech. specs of this GCA-4020B on the web, but got nowhere so far.
Cheers,
Jan"
Info on Non-Pioneer Superdrive in recent iMac G4s (DVD-R/-RW plus DVD-RAM?) About a month or so ago I had heard that some new iMac G4s had non-Pioneer DVD-R/RW drives - a reader with one of these just sent an email with more info:
" Hey Mike ...
Just wanted to let you know that Apple has changed the SuperDrive in the latest shipping iMacs. I just bought a 17" iMac LCD straight from Apple's Developer Connection (we're Select developers at work) and I was surprised to see that Mac OS 9.2.2's Apple System Profiler identified the drive as
-------------------------------------------------------------------
DVD-R/CD-RW
Driver version: 1.4.8
Mac OS partitions: 0
Removable media: Yes
Vendor: HL-DT-ST
Revision Number: D02D
Product ID: DVD-RW GCA-4020B
Apple disc burning: Supported
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Depending on who you believe, "HL-DT-ST" is either Hitachi or GoldStar in Korea - I'm not sure which.
A few Google searches revealed that this drive does DVD-R, DVD-RW *and* DVD-RAM! And, supposedly, the CD-R burning speeds are 12x, which is apparently faster than the previous Pioneer SuperDrives. (I can't personally verify this myself, not knowing the specs of the Pioneer A03/A04)
(Pioneer DVR-104/A04 and 103/A04 have a 8x/4x max (CDR/CDRW) burn speed rating.-Mike)
The only place I could find on the Mac Web that mentioned this new development is a 5-day old article on MacWelt.DE, the German Mac site.
Regards,
- Greg E"
About a dozen readers wrote in reply to this post mentioning LG or Hitachi links, etc. - another iMac G4 owner sent info from the label on the drive:
"FYI, I'll read off the label on a superdrive taken out of 17" iMac delivered approx. 3 weeks ago (yep, I've opened the iMac to take a closer look):
H�L Data Storage
CD-RW / DVD-R/RW DRIVE
MODEL No. GCA-4020B
DRIVE REV. A1
manufactured SEPTEMBER 2002
Hitachi-LG Data Storage, Inc.
(...), Tokyo, Japan
MADE IN JAPAN
I tried to look up tech. specs of this GCA-4020B on the web, but got nowhere so far.
Cheers,
Jan"
msmith2112
Sep 17, 03:50 PM
?
Shrek
Sep 11, 05:32 PM
Originally posted by MacsRgr8
This could give Apple alot of options:
All pro-Macs: 64 bit IBM (maybe even quads:) )
All consumer-Macs: 32 bit Moto (maybe even duals)
A very flexible line up. Mhz no issue. I believe that Apple is not using the 1GHz Saharas for the iBook just for the reason that "it sounds more" than an 800 MHz G4. (so much for the MHz-myth campaign
:( ). Being able to sell 64 bit- Mac's will sound gr8, no matter the Mhz.
No, I don't think it's very smart to use dual processors in consumer computers. That's makes it look like Apple is trying too hard to manufacture faster systems. Besides, only workstations use more than one processor--consumer machines do NOT.
Instead, Motorola should take advantage of 90-nanometer technology and manufacture chips at clock speeds that easily rival Intel/AMD processors; that would mean pushing for 3GHz and beyond.
IBM has said (http://news.com.com/2100-1001-257421.html) it wants to hit 2GHz by the end of but I think they're going to be a little late releasing it since Apple's next OS (10.3/Panther) likely want be here until January 2003 as Apple has indicated (http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2002/sep/10macosx.html); if IBM's 64-bit G5 is truly coming in January then I expect Apple's next OS to be 64-bit/32-bit backward compatible.
That's my $0.02 on that. ;)
This could give Apple alot of options:
All pro-Macs: 64 bit IBM (maybe even quads:) )
All consumer-Macs: 32 bit Moto (maybe even duals)
A very flexible line up. Mhz no issue. I believe that Apple is not using the 1GHz Saharas for the iBook just for the reason that "it sounds more" than an 800 MHz G4. (so much for the MHz-myth campaign
:( ). Being able to sell 64 bit- Mac's will sound gr8, no matter the Mhz.
No, I don't think it's very smart to use dual processors in consumer computers. That's makes it look like Apple is trying too hard to manufacture faster systems. Besides, only workstations use more than one processor--consumer machines do NOT.
Instead, Motorola should take advantage of 90-nanometer technology and manufacture chips at clock speeds that easily rival Intel/AMD processors; that would mean pushing for 3GHz and beyond.
IBM has said (http://news.com.com/2100-1001-257421.html) it wants to hit 2GHz by the end of but I think they're going to be a little late releasing it since Apple's next OS (10.3/Panther) likely want be here until January 2003 as Apple has indicated (http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2002/sep/10macosx.html); if IBM's 64-bit G5 is truly coming in January then I expect Apple's next OS to be 64-bit/32-bit backward compatible.
That's my $0.02 on that. ;)
MacRumorUser
Mar 24, 07:54 AM
I also thought it interfered with the gyros?
Nah thats those cheap dole cheats
(giro's ;) )
Nah thats those cheap dole cheats
(giro's ;) )
iMeowbot
Apr 8, 03:14 PM
It's probably this stuff (http://edocs.bea.com/wladapters/peoplesoft/docs81/index.html). This is really old news (http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=567).
dogbone
Apr 28, 06:32 PM
This is kind the reason i got my own domain. It looks good on a resumé, travels with me, and damn it looks cool! i have about 10 email address that are @willsisti.net
Sorry, to be :cool: it *must* be .com
.net means you got there second.
Sorry, to be :cool: it *must* be .com
.net means you got there second.
MisterMe
Jun 9, 03:51 PM
You argument had something going for it up until the end where it just fell appart. I sorry but a compared a $1000 HDTV to lets say a $2000+ of the same size and you see a very noticible diffence in quillity.
...I am not going to get into an argument with you over this. The point is that the prices of flat panel displays are dropping rapidly. Those $1000 HDTV sets at Wal-Mart occupy the low end. However, the prices of high end displays are also dropping like a stone. FWIW, Panasonic will sell you a 42-inch plasma screen integrated HDTV for $2500-$3000. Your price of $4000 US buys a 50-inch top-of-the-line plasma screen integrated HDTV. The company has 50-inch sets for $3500 if $4000 is too rich for your blood. Neither Panasonic set would qualify as low-quality.
I believe that I have made my point. The prices of flat panel television sets are in steep decline. Apple has nothing to add to the market for HDTV sets. The company would be virtually guaranteed to lose its shirt selling them.
...I am not going to get into an argument with you over this. The point is that the prices of flat panel displays are dropping rapidly. Those $1000 HDTV sets at Wal-Mart occupy the low end. However, the prices of high end displays are also dropping like a stone. FWIW, Panasonic will sell you a 42-inch plasma screen integrated HDTV for $2500-$3000. Your price of $4000 US buys a 50-inch top-of-the-line plasma screen integrated HDTV. The company has 50-inch sets for $3500 if $4000 is too rich for your blood. Neither Panasonic set would qualify as low-quality.
I believe that I have made my point. The prices of flat panel television sets are in steep decline. Apple has nothing to add to the market for HDTV sets. The company would be virtually guaranteed to lose its shirt selling them.
matd
Jan 28, 10:56 AM
Hi !
The german website Heise presents the new features of MacOsX 10.4 Server
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/55700
They think that the Tiger OS, will be launched approximately the same date than the "normal" version would be.
Check also apple's page : http://www.apple.com/macosx/ No one talks no more about Panther !
http://www.apple.com/server/macosx/tiger/ (http://www.apple.com/server/macosx/tiger/ )
The german website Heise presents the new features of MacOsX 10.4 Server
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/55700
They think that the Tiger OS, will be launched approximately the same date than the "normal" version would be.
Check also apple's page : http://www.apple.com/macosx/ No one talks no more about Panther !
http://www.apple.com/server/macosx/tiger/ (http://www.apple.com/server/macosx/tiger/ )
soilchmst
Aug 27, 10:04 AM
Originally posted by dukestreet
if you were going for sarcasm you should use the :rolleyes: , ;) isn't strong enough......
Thanks for the advice. I will watch the smiles next time
if you were going for sarcasm you should use the :rolleyes: , ;) isn't strong enough......
Thanks for the advice. I will watch the smiles next time
~loserman~
Mar 20, 05:17 PM
The trouble with DRM is that it often affects the average Joe consumer more than it hurts those it's intended to stop.
CDs that don't play in a PC annoy Joe Public who buys a CD and wants to listen to it on his office PC while at work. The guy who planned on pirating it can easily get round the DRM and go on his merry way.
DRM embedded in iTunes annoy Joe Public who burned a track onto his wedding video and now can't distribute it to the wedding guests without working out an authorise/deauthorise schedule.
The record companies assume everyone is out to be a criminal while the 'criminals' don't bother buying DRMed files or strip out protection and do what they want so just as many files end up on P2P networks and on dodgy CDs on street corners.
Therein lay the problem. Most people are using the music illegally.
The record industry is right.
In your own analogy of Joe Public burning a track on his wedding video.
Guess what? when he distributes those copies to wedding guests he breaks the law.
It's illegal for him to do that. It is stealing. He pirated it.
The problem is we have become so used to stealing that we don't recognize it as such anymore. We justify it away.
Almost no one would even consider it to be wrong if they bought a cd copied it and gave it to their friends. It is wrong. It's stealing/pirating.
CDs that don't play in a PC annoy Joe Public who buys a CD and wants to listen to it on his office PC while at work. The guy who planned on pirating it can easily get round the DRM and go on his merry way.
DRM embedded in iTunes annoy Joe Public who burned a track onto his wedding video and now can't distribute it to the wedding guests without working out an authorise/deauthorise schedule.
The record companies assume everyone is out to be a criminal while the 'criminals' don't bother buying DRMed files or strip out protection and do what they want so just as many files end up on P2P networks and on dodgy CDs on street corners.
Therein lay the problem. Most people are using the music illegally.
The record industry is right.
In your own analogy of Joe Public burning a track on his wedding video.
Guess what? when he distributes those copies to wedding guests he breaks the law.
It's illegal for him to do that. It is stealing. He pirated it.
The problem is we have become so used to stealing that we don't recognize it as such anymore. We justify it away.
Almost no one would even consider it to be wrong if they bought a cd copied it and gave it to their friends. It is wrong. It's stealing/pirating.
applekid
Oct 17, 04:10 PM
Didn't you hear? CherryOS is all a hoax.
http://www.yourmaclife.com/
http://forums.appletalk.com.au/index.php?showtopic=1831&st=15&#entry14705
http://www.yourmaclife.com/
http://forums.appletalk.com.au/index.php?showtopic=1831&st=15&#entry14705
ninewhereman
Mar 23, 01:37 AM
I take back my previous statement. :o I am at work and didn't have time to read the link. That is very disappointing. Hopefully we will see a full fledged sequel soon. It has been long enough.
EricNau
Nov 23, 01:12 AM
Good Idea! After reading this thread I decided to get my iMac G5 up and folding again. Hope it helps! :)
Doctor Q
Jun 26, 01:51 PM
Yes, no uninvited noise when I arrive at a web page, please. I often hit the mute button as soon as I hit such a page, but pages with videos that start are also wasting bandwidth and slowing down my system whether I'm interested in their movie or not. Stop that! Bad webmaster! :rolls up newspaper:
Sometimes I forget to unmute after stumbling onto an "auto-noise" site, and then I later miss something I did want to hear, like a chat invitation, until I happen to notice the sound is muted. Rather than blame myself for forgetting to unmute, I prefer to blame the site that made me mute in the first place.
Sometimes I forget to unmute after stumbling onto an "auto-noise" site, and then I later miss something I did want to hear, like a chat invitation, until I happen to notice the sound is muted. Rather than blame myself for forgetting to unmute, I prefer to blame the site that made me mute in the first place.
4JNA
May 1, 10:17 PM
have windows boxes talking to that server. also went and pinged it from several different domains/ips. no problems here.
what changed? was working? new install?
had a similar problem with two new install boxes. turned out to be a checkmark in the 'use IE settings' box. removed the check, restated the service, and it's been good since. just a thought.
stanford shows that server as up and functional. as of now.
good luck.
what changed? was working? new install?
had a similar problem with two new install boxes. turned out to be a checkmark in the 'use IE settings' box. removed the check, restated the service, and it's been good since. just a thought.
stanford shows that server as up and functional. as of now.
good luck.
Patmian212
Jun 11, 08:29 PM
ERRRR Whats the banner project?
